Nooligan and Street Boy Essay -- English Literature

Nooligan and Street Boy The sonnets Nooligan by Roger McGough and Road Boy by Gareth Owen are two sonnets which both arrangement with the issue of high school hooliganism, what's more, the two writers use language to make a distinctive feeling of character. Albeit both arrangement with a similar topic, there are numerous similitudes also, contrasts between the two. Nooligan is about a kid who thinks he is extremely ground-breaking and cruel in any case, is really an uneducated kid attempting to be a genuine law breaker. Road Boy is additionally about a criminal with the exception of that he really is more ground-breaking and has a higher status than the sub-par Nooligan. One of the primary likenesses is that both the artists present the characters as utilizing slang language or an off base type of English. In Nooligan for instance the kid says in the fourth line of the third section: Football's me game (All things considered, watchin') McGough has utilized me rather than my. This depicts the Nooligan as unintelligent and uneducated as a result of the utilization of words and language structure, since the sonnet gives us a feeling that Nooligan isn't the sort of individual who might buckle down (he doesn't give a hurl), I'm most certainly not astounded at the law breaker's English. The utilization of slang by the crook in Road Boy is behold rather than tune in or hear and stompin' rather than strolling. The impacts that these two words put on us are that we begin to imagine that the kid really has a few force and disposition, and we accept that he really is the domineering jerk that he's discussing. And yet, the utilization of these slang words causes the characters to seem, by all accounts, to be silly and inept. Another closeness that the artist utilizes in the two sonnets is that in them two, the primary line of each section is the sa... ...he is. The words stompin', quietness, dispersed, stoned all show that. All in all, the two sonnets are fascinating and participating in terms of the utilization of words, tone, structure and so on. The artists Roger McGough (Nooligan) and Gareth Owen (Street Boy) utilize explicit strategies to give the sonnets a specific impact. There are contrasts what's more, similitudes between the two clearly. The primary closeness is the writers' utilization of slang and an off base type of English and the primary distinction is the language and jargon between the two sonnets. Something worth referencing is that the artists have made the sonnets identify with all young people by and large since the name of the Nooligan furthermore, the Road Boy aren't given. So generally, there are a great deal of similitudes and contrasts between the two, however both are to the point and give you a general thought of what the sonnet is about.

The Characters of For Whom the Southern Belle Tolls Essay -- For Whom

The Characters of For Whom the Southern Belle Tollsâ â Â â For Whom the Southern Belle Tolls is Christopher Durang's entertaining 1994 satire of The Glass Menagerie, a 1945 play by Tennessee Williams. In the two plays, the fundamental characters must arrangement with a few significant issues, including segregation, dread of the outside world, and the requirement for comprehension. While the characters in The Glass Menagerie handle their issues in a generally genuine way, those in For Whom the Southern Belle Tolls adopt a progressively ridiculous strategy. For Whom the Southern Belle Tolls offers a substitute perspective on the circumstances in The Glass Menagerie, and it remarks on how the American culture has changed since the 1940s. Durang's satire achieves its cleverness by creating outrageous renditions of the characters in The Glass Menagerie through amplification of their flaws and peculiarities: Laura's bashfulness toward the world, Amanda's absence of comprehension for her youngsters, Tom's annoyance with his family, and Jim's incomplete deafness (anyway minor in Williams' play). It is progressively hard to feel for Lawrence in For Whom the Southern Belle Tolls than with Laura in The Glass Menagerie since he is a lot more bothering and disgraceful than his female partner. Laura is a young lady who experiences extraordinary timidity and hesitance since she has a somewhat deformed leg and necessities to wear a leg support; therefore, she is reluctant to converse with new individuals and enter new circumstances. Laura's mental issues are intensified in Lawrence, who fakes a few diseases, including asthma, skin inflammation, and a disabled leg. He never goes out, and his lone companions are his glass swizzle sticks, which he gives such names as Q-tip (1942), Ther... ...children's; also, Durang includes two gay characters: Tom and Ginny. This is proof that For Whom the Belle Tolls accomplishes something other than give a hilarious way to deal with the circumstances in The Glass Menagerie: it shows how the American culture and family have changed since Williams composed his play. As per Durang, individuals have gotten progressively open with their own sentiments and sexuality, however they have additionally become increasingly egotistical. Works Cited Durang, Christopher. For Whom the Southern Belle Tolls. Writing and Its Writers: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Eds. Ann Charters and Samuel Charters. Boston: Bedford Books, 1997. 1937-1948. Williams, Tennessee. The Glass Menagerie. Literature and Its Writers: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Eds. Ann Charters and Samuel Charters. Boston: Bedford Books, 1997. 1704-1750. Â Â